RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Pod-Coverage

3 out of 3 found this review helpful:

Pod-Coverage (0.18) ****

Darn useful! Even though Test::Pod::Coverage usually bites me just when I think I'm ready to release a module, I still love it. It saves me from sending a lot of undocumented code into the wild -- and this is the code that makes it go.

Ricardo SIGNES - 2007-05-08 19:07:25
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Pod-Coverage (0.17) ****

It's great, but it's easy to misunderstand the interface and use it incorrectly so that it looks like a module passes Pod::Coverage tests when it doesn't.

Also, there are no hooks to handle inheritence. If a Foo isa('Bar'), then when Foo has methods which override those of Bar, Pod::Coverage doesn't recognize this. Sometimes that's expected behavior: maybe you should odcument exactly what's changed. But sometimes you document it differently, and do not want to list every updated method. It would be nice if there was an option to recognize when this occurs and ignore them.

Robert Rothenberg - 2005-04-03 16:32:30
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

2 out of 2 found this review helpful:

Pod-Coverage (0.12) *****

Pod::Coverage is a very useful module that, when used in another module's test suite, should help improve that modules documentation by a great deal. Of course, developers are free to insert empty documentation stubs for their methods, but those willing to do that don't need Pod::Coverage to remind them of the lacking documentation in the first place.

Steffen M�ller - 2003-10-05 01:49:29
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful:

Pod-Coverage (0.12) *****

Nice module that allows you to check whether your subroutines are documented with POD. Very useful in test suites to make sure you keep everything documented.

Adrian Howard - 2003-10-01 06:34:20
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No


the camel