| CPAN Ratings (Gamma) Mouse reviews | |
| Home | Search | About | Login |
RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Mouse
2 out of 6 found this review helpful:
A nice, light-weight alternative to the Moose fad.
Pista Palo - 2009-12-07 20:41:54
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
One and all, why the hell do you rate this module?
If you ask me, Mouse cannot be praised for its convenience as an alternative
to Moose too much. Moose requires Class::MOP. What if you had no compiler?
I, of course, know that as of 0.65, Class::MOP supports non-XS as well.
That said, I wouldn't use Moose when no one has a compiler.
P.S.
It is regrettable that Shawn M Moore declined to maintain Mouse even though
he wrote this module. For the details, see http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.moose/2009/04/msg653.html
I'm not going to change the rate of the module, nonetheless.
Taro Nishino - 2009-04-13 14:11:15
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
|
|
|