Parser-MGC
(0.10)
The documentation gives cogent descriptions and examples of methods and API enhancement. The interface is friendly OO, so it can be smoothly used. Also, the distribution comes with a full test suite and a handy examples directory.
Gene Boggs - 2012-03-03T09:09:21
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
1 out of 4 found this review helpful:
JS (0.17)
hm
Gene Boggs - 2012-01-08T16:30:09
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
7 out of 12 found this review helpful:
Badger (0.06)
hm
Gene Boggs - 2011-07-14T18:33:42
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
1 out of 6 found this review helpful:
Love-Match-Calc (0.2)
hm
Gene Boggs - 2011-07-14T18:33:12
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
3 out of 4 found this review helpful:
Dpchrist-LangUtil (1.007)
Why a personal namespace? Possibly vanity? If it is a set used by more than yourself, I wonder if you've ever heard of github or tried having your own server with a mini cpan, for your distributed Dpchrist organization.
Also, I wonder why you don't just use modules that perform seemingly the very same things your modules appear to do. These duplicate packages are maintained by dedicated, active authors. Your forked implementations are susceptible of becoming out of sync in no time.
Gene Boggs - 2010-11-24T22:30:31
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
2 out of 2 found this review helpful:
MIDI-Perl
(0.82)
MIDI-Perl
(0.82)
I love this package. It has been the source of enjoyment and serious music development for years. Thanks Sean and D. Conklin. :)
I rated "Ease of use" low because I have to RTFM and trial-error until I finally get something working, just about every time, even though I have used this for years.
Gene Boggs - 2010-08-23T14:13:30
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
1 out of 2 found this review helpful:
Pod-S5
(0.08)
Pod-S5
(0.08)
This has made my YAPC::NA 2010 presentation a breeze, since I'd already started writing it in POD and decided to use s5 for the slideshow. Yay
Gene Boggs - 2010-06-14T06:37:31
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
1 out of 1 found this review helpful:
Math-Fractal-Noisemaker
(0.101)
Math-Fractal-Noisemaker
(0.101)
Wow this module is cool! Useful for many types of pattern generation, including my crazy musical experimentations. Bravo!
Gene Boggs - 2009-12-26T18:43:54
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
3 out of 9 found this review helpful:
onto-perl (1.03)
Please learn about proper CPAN namespaces before publishing. Thanks.
Gene Boggs - 2007-12-03T09:48:29
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
2 out of 5 found this review helpful:
GD-Graph-radar (0.10)
Version 0.1001 should run through the tests without a hitch, for Win32 users... <fingers crossed> :)
Gene Boggs - 2007-12-01T21:02:23
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
9 out of 10 found this review helpful:
Eludia (07.06.15)
The point of ratings is not to become defensive, Dmitry, it is to understand the rater's commentary and fix your code if it is warranted (which it is in this case).
Gene Boggs - 2007-06-18T02:16:33
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
4 out of 5 found this review helpful:
PTools
(0.02)
PTools
(0.02)
Nice. Reinventing wheels as lumpy trapezoids! Yay! Fortunately the language, Perl, has this stuff already.
Gene Boggs - 2007-05-29T00:34:24
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
10 out of 10 found this review helpful:
package
(0.0019)
package
(0.0019)
Making a stupid, needless top level package is bad enough but naming your package, 'package' is just fucking moronic.
Gene Boggs - 2007-04-30T15:21:40
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
12 out of 12 found this review helpful:
Math
(0.499)
Math
(0.499)
All these things are already available. For instance odd() - WTF? Ever hear of the modulo operator (%)? Is the author actually aware of CPAN or does he just blindly upload redundant things to it with overly general namespaces?
Gene Boggs - 2007-04-12T16:27:41
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
13 out of 14 found this review helpful:
perl
(5.14.1)
perl
(5.14.1)
Perl has:
A. Allowed me to be employed and therefore survive.
B. Allowed me to realize every algorithmic task I make for myself.
Thank you Larry.
Gene Boggs - 2004-02-22T10:16:02
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
