| CPAN Ratings (Gamma) Reviews by Gene Boggs | |
| Home | Search | About | Login |
RSS | Module Info | Add a review of
2 out of 8 found this review helpful:
Please learn about proper CPAN namespaces before publishing. Thanks.
Gene Boggs - 2007-12-03 09:48:29
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Version 0.1001 should run through the tests without a hitch, for Win32 users... <fingers crossed> :)
Gene Boggs - 2007-12-01 21:02:23
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
The point of ratings is not to become defensive, Dmitry, it is to understand the rater's commentary and fix your code if it is warranted (which it is in this case).
Gene Boggs - 2007-06-18 02:16:33
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Nice. Reinventing wheels as lumpy trapezoids! Yay! Fortunately the language, Perl, has this stuff already.
Gene Boggs - 2007-05-29 00:34:24
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Making a stupid, needless top level package is bad enough but naming your package, 'package' is just fucking moronic.
Gene Boggs - 2007-04-30 15:21:40
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
All these things are already available. For instance odd() - WTF? Ever hear of the modulo operator (%)? Is the author actually aware of CPAN or does he just blindly upload redundant things to it with overly general namespaces?
Gene Boggs - 2007-04-12 16:27:41
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Perl has:
A. Allowed me to be employed and therefore survive.
B. Allowed me to realize every algorithmic task I make for myself.
Thank you Larry.
Gene Boggs - 2004-02-22 10:16:02
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
|
Perl.org sites
: bugs
| dev
| history
| jobs
| learn
| lists
| use
Site Information and Contacts |
|