| CPAN Ratings (Gamma) Reviews by Adrian Howard | |
| Home | Search | About | Login |
RSS | Module Info | Add a review of
7 out of 7 found this review helpful:
Simple, flexible and blindingly fast code profiling system. Stupidly useful. Thoroughly recommended.
Adrian Howard - 2008-05-08 09:29:35
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
ASCII Art Visio - it rocks!
Adrian Howard - 2008-04-09 00:49:29
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
It's lightweight. It does what it says on the tin. The bugs I report get fixed. I like it :-)
Adrian Howard - 2008-03-20 04:17:00
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
It sends commit messages. You can make them pretty. You can configure the heck out of it. Is good.
Adrian Howard - 2008-03-12 16:20:23
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Nice API, and would be a pleasure to use if it didn't reject some valid postcodes - hence the low rating. Would be a five otherwise.
There is an outstanding RT issue with a patch for the problem since 2006 :-)
Adrian Howard - 2007-05-10 04:37:05
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Clean. Elegant. Fast. So far every time I've looked for a bit of functionality it's been there hiding in the docs. Thoroughly recommended.
Adrian Howard - 2007-02-27 02:25:01
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Nice abstraction for handling database handles. Being able to register multiple DBHs for live/testing/etc. is a boon.
Adrian Howard - 2007-02-27 02:22:34
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
This rocks. Just removed a bunch of awk/sed/find/grep alias in my *.rc files since this handles them all much more nicely. Huzzah.
Adrian Howard - 2007-02-27 02:21:28
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
I like this rather a lot. A nice minimal implementation of inside out objects that doesn't get in the way, and doesn't force you to recast your entire OO infrastructure. No source filters, CHECK blocks, etc. so works fine with mod_perl. Nice.
Adrian Howard - 2006-05-13 03:23:27
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Just a quick comment that you can use Test::Exception without prototypes if you so wish, and since 0.21 this is documented in the POD.
Adrian Howard - 2005-07-21 10:00:08
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Growl is a rather funky open-source notification framework for Mac OS X. There are several different possible ways of talking to Growl via Perl (Applescript, command line, etc.) and Mac::Growl does a good job of hiding all of this behind a single API. Nice.
Adrian Howard - 2005-03-16 08:04:30
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
A simplified subset of Spreadsheet::ParseExcel functionality.
For many real world tasks with Excel spreadsheets all you need to do is read rows of data from sheets. This module provides a clean and simple API for doing just that.
Does exactly what it says on the tin.
Adrian Howard - 2004-09-01 05:36:09
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Handy module for testing that your POD is syntactically correct. Reduced my POD test file from 40 odd lines of code to just 4.
Adrian Howard - 2003-11-24 08:55:44
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Allows you to pretend to run a function in a higher stack frame. Useful for wrapping subroutines so that they don't realise that they're wrapped.
Adrian Howard - 2003-10-24 14:54:02
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Replacement for ExtUtils::MakeMaker. Very nice. If you need to write custom build scripts try this instead of ExtUtils::MakeMaker. It's 100% Perl OO architecture makes everything so much more simple.
Adrian Howard - 2003-10-16 01:18:22
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Nice module that allows you to check whether your subroutines are documented with POD. Very useful in test suites to make sure you keep everything documented.
Adrian Howard - 2003-10-01 06:34:20
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Allows you to declare multiple exception classes concisely. API documented well. Easy to override default behaviour when you need to.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-18 09:38:50
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Handy for testing complex data structures.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-10 12:39:40
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Does the job and doesn't suck. Excellent module.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-09 06:40:01
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Handy module for testing contents of database rows.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-07 15:03:31
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Excellent module. Does the job.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-03 09:51:32
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Handy module for unit testing code that may throw warnings.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-02 09:30:46
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Very nice Wiki implementation. Very easy to setup. Very easy to customise.
The only thing I miss is an RSS view of recent changes.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-01 08:13:28
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
It's a joke. Not a very good one mind, but a joke.
Adrian Howard - 2003-09-01 01:31:23
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Very nice tool for generating simple parsers / screen scrapers. You write a template toolkit template that would generate your content (using a subset of TT commands) and Template::Extract does the rest.
Most funky.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-31 09:31:24
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Very handy module for creating globally unique identifiers. Simple. Does the job.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-28 03:23:41
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Excellent module for those who need to export various syndication formats. Supports RSS 0.9, 0.91 and RSS 1.0
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-28 03:17:38
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Nice alternative to Email::Valid that provides several more mechanisms for validating email addresses.
Loses a few points on the interface since package behaviour is controlled by global variables, which can make it a bit of a pain in persistent environments like mod_perl.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-22 04:00:25
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
No documentation. Covers some of the same ground as List::Util.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-21 07:25:51
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Handy little module for getting meta-data on a module (version, etc.)
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-16 02:13:55
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Really excellent tool. I find it invaluable for writing acceptance tests for web based applications.
My only (minor) quibble is the lack of support for multiple submit buttons with the same name (see http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=2308), which can occasionally be annoying.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-15 06:13:15
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Powerful enough to get the job done. Simple enough not to get in your way. Very easy to customise. My favourite templating system.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-13 14:16:18
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
The foundation of all recent Perl test libraries. Simple. Flexible. Nice design. Everybody should use it.
Adrian Howard - 2003-08-13 14:11:01
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
|
Perl.org sites
: bugs
| dev
| history
| jobs
| learn
| lists
| use
Site Information and Contacts |
|