RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Time-Local

8 out of 8 found this review helpful:

Time-Local (1.15) ****

Ignore reviews that claim that this module is buggy or insane. It is indispensable and has no significant known bugs. I use it frequently and without having to worry about it. It should be part of the standard repertoire of any Perl coder.

Ricardo SIGNES - 2007-01-23 02:36:49
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

6 out of 6 found this review helpful:

Time-Local (1.13)

It seems to me that the author of previous rating did not understand the purpose of the module (being just the inverse of perl's localtime() function) and how to use it (like localtime, timelocal uses 0..11 as month range).

Slaven Rezic - 2006-12-05 01:25:36
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

1 out of 17 found this review helpful:

Time-Local (1.13) *

The package assumes that the month October is 30 days long. Moreover, it stops to execute when a non-assumed date occures.
The usage is difficult: you have to parse the date. I think, one should use David Muir Sharnoff's time packages http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-modules/ instead.

Rev Tamas - 2006-12-01 05:58:51
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No


the camel