RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Test-WWW-Mechanize

2 out of 2 found this review helpful:

Test-WWW-Mechanize (1.24) *****

*The* module for all your website-testing needs. It takes a while to get used to the commands (especially if, like me, you used LWP extensively before discovering WWW::Mechanize, which this module derives from), but once you do you get a testing environment perfectly suited for testing websites. A real workhorse.

Gaurav Vaidya - 2009-10-04 23:25:53
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

0 out of 2 found this review helpful:

Test-WWW-Mechanize (1.24)

Thanks for this wonderful module!

linuxrawkstar - 2009-08-03 07:29:18
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

4 out of 5 found this review helpful:

Test-WWW-Mechanize (1.12)

A well-documented, regularly-maintained member of the Test genre which provides methods as simple and straight-forward as those in Test/Test::More, for getting, posting, and testing web server responses.

Caveat: some of my code uses an "import" routine, without using Exporter.pm and its %EXPORT_TAGS-type variables. This causes WWW::Test::Mechanise to halt with compilation errors. This has just been reported, but is worth bearing in mind.

Lee Goddard - 2006-09-07 05:23:10
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

6 out of 6 found this review helpful:

Test-WWW-Mechanize (1.08) *****

This module is a highly useful tool for testing web applications. The documentation has a few weaknesses and I had to go to the source code a couple of times to figure out how to use the methods correctly. But otherwise, I have nothing but praise for this module.

The author is VERY responsive. How refreshing! :-)

Chris Dolan - 2005-11-21 15:28:18
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

6 out of 6 found this review helpful:

Test-WWW-Mechanize (1.06) *****

If you write web applications, you probably need this module. It's like the beautiful love-child of Test::More and WWW::Mechanize. You say, "Go here and do this, and that should happen" and it takes care of telling you how you screwed up. Sure, you could just use WWW::Mechanize and a bit of glue to make it work with Test::More, but why bother? This modules makes web testers happy.

Ricardo SIGNES - 2005-11-04 18:41:04
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No


the camel