Test-Functional reviews

cpanratings
 

RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Test-Functional

Test-Functional (0.03) *****

Pista Palo:

I think your review is unfair. I'm voting this distribution a five to negate your vote. As you indicate, you voted this distribution a one primarily because there are many other testing distributions.

Personally, I am very happy to see more testing distributions. This encourages innovation and gives people many options to choose between. This particular distribution may very well be exactly what someone is looking for. I think low-rating distributions based on invalid criteria stifles innovation and discourages contributions to the CPAN.

Besides, the contributor behind this distribution definitely did his due diligence. He even posted an RFC to perl.qa prior to uploading it to CPAN. See: www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2009/...
1 hidden unhelpful review