Object-Simple reviews

cpanratings
 

RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Object-Simple

Object-Simple (3.09) ****

I am glad someone took Mojo::Base and made a module out of it. I've tested several minimal pure-Perl class builders and this one came out really fast. Only Object::Tiny is a tad faster, but the difference is irrelevant. In terms of features it does the basics so you don't have to write your accessors by hand. Doesn't bother with constraints ro/rw accesors, etc. If you need that, use Mo or something else. This module does not deserve a bad review.

gvl - 2013-10-27T10:12:28 (permalink)

2 out of 2 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Object-Simple (3.09)

Very good!

Daniel Vinciguerra - 2013-10-09T13:29:35 (permalink)

0 out of 3 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Object-Simple (3.09)

It is pretty small. I found it useful to learn how to write your own object module or understand moose from the code. thanks.

Hao Wu - 2013-09-29T11:21:18 (permalink)

3 out of 3 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Object-Simple (2.1203) *

I don't always oppose reinventing the wheel, in the case of this module, however, I wonder if it is worthy to be registered at any cost on CPAN.
You already have Moose, Mouse, etc. and otherwise Class::Accessor if you dislike the previous modules. Enough already! Do you need yet another but half-baked module, nonetheless?
I hear the author says that he is going to enlighten the perl's newbies, to be honest, however, in no case is he qualified to do so. In fact, he seems to be conceited because of the publication of his only book regarding Perl.
In any case, I fear that what he says and does would mislead the newbies (especially Japanese) deceived by another handle name of his, "perlcodesample".

Taro Nishino - 2009-12-27T14:18:37 (permalink)

6 out of 8 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No
1 hidden unhelpful review