Nothing-Tiny reviews

cpanratings
 

RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Nothing-Tiny

Nothing-Tiny (1) *

Claims to be Tiny, but fails due to "use strict; use warnings;" that also make it not portable on anything older than perl 5.6.

Also, as a distribution using Module::Install, it is definitely not "tiny" and waste space on CPAN mirrors.

Olivier Mengué (dolmen) - 2012-07-17T05:05:05 (permalink)

1 out of 3 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1) *

a waste

Gabriel Millerd - 2008-02-11T10:52:19 (permalink)

7 out of 16 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1)

Re: “Your opinion on this module doesn’t matter to me, so why bother writing it?”

Writing a response is a weird way of expressing your lack of interest.

Re: “Why are you wasting your time reviewing this module? Do you really have that much free time?”

Why did you waste your time writing this module and putting it on CPAN? Do you really have that much free time?

Aristotle Pagaltzis - 2008-02-11T01:25:42 (permalink)

10 out of 17 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1) *

Jonathan T. Rockway wrote: "my coworkers and I all had a good laugh afterwards".

Well done then.

John McNamara - 2008-02-11T00:54:57 (permalink)

11 out of 16 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1)

I fail to see which criteria of ::Tiny this module fails to meet. Also, who died and left you in charge of a non-namespace anyway.

To the other posters: why are you wasting your time reviewing this module? Do you really have that much free time?

This module took me about 5 minutes to write and CPAN, and my coworkers and I all had a good laugh afterwards. That is the purpose this module serves.

Your opinion on this module doesn't matter to me, so why bother writing it? You're just wasting your time.

Jonathan Rockway - 2008-02-11T00:36:23 (permalink)

7 out of 17 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1) *

Trolls should at least be clever. This one isn't.

seano - 2008-02-09T05:55:22 (permalink)

6 out of 17 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1) ***

Excellent documentation (it does exactly what it claims) and responsive author (he accepted a patch I submitted via IRC, hopefully we'll see a 0.02 release soon!). But I don't quite understand the postmodern angst he's responding too, why not just use Moose::Tiny?

Chris Prather - 2008-02-04T13:47:12 (permalink)

8 out of 13 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1) *

Manages to simultaneously be pointless, while not meeting the criteria for ::Tiny, and failing as a joke. Only succeeds in being a troll.

Adam Kennedy - 2008-02-03T10:01:53 (permalink)

9 out of 12 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1) *

I assume this has been uploaded to troll Adam Kennedy after his low review of and ill humor about Moose-Tiny. This is a joke distribution, but it doesn't seem very funny. It's not even a clever bit of code. It's just a waste of space seemingly done for no good or entertaining reason.

Ricardo Signes - 2008-02-02T07:53:36 (permalink)

12 out of 14 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Nothing-Tiny (1)

useless garbage like this should go under the Acme namespace

forbin - 2008-02-02T00:10:52 (permalink)

6 out of 10 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No