Net-Twitter reviews

cpanratings
 

RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Net-Twitter

Net-Twitter (4.00003) ****

Perfect and what we need to be able to operate correctly with Twitter API through Perl.

Josep Roura - 2013-02-28T03:49:21 (permalink)

2 out of 2 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Net-Twitter (3.13008) *****

Just what you need to deal with Twitter (and identi.ca)

Roberto Etcheverry - 2010-09-01T08:51:02 (permalink)

1 out of 3 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Net-Twitter (3.04002) ****

It's fairly easy to use, subject to the limitations of the Twitter API. I was able to hack a script that interfaced with it quickly.
My only grumble is that it doesn't support proxies, but I can get by without that.

Robert Rothenberg - 2009-07-23T09:14:45 (permalink)

1 out of 1 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Net-Twitter (2.12) *


A rather shallow and infrequently updated access to Twitter. Lots of Twitter API calls missing; and no protocol to specify what these might be. Lots of errors with get_error and its ridiculous return values (sometimes returns hashref, arrayref, scalar, etc). Overall, it's much better to implement your own Twitter calls with LWP then relying on this outdated module. I made a big mistake using this in my script, and it has caused hours and hours of headaches to get rid of it.

lokilogan - 2009-05-18T23:55:22 (permalink)

5 out of 9 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Net-Twitter (2.12) *****

great module! just what i needed! thank you!! :)

Supersan - 2009-05-06T04:32:16 (permalink)

1 out of 2 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Net-Twitter (1.14) *****

Great stuff - does exactly what I needed, and with a clear, sane interface.

David Precious - 2008-06-19T08:38:35 (permalink)

2 out of 2 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Net-Twitter (1.13) *****

It implements the Twitter API in a clear OO interface and is very well documented. My previous marks against this API for documentation issues are retracted.

hanenkamp - 2008-06-10T15:26:04 (permalink)

6 out of 6 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No