RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Net-Twitter
Net-Twitter
(4.00003)
Perfect and what we need to be able to operate correctly with Twitter API through Perl.
Josep Roura - 2013-02-28T03:49:21 (permalink)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Net-Twitter
(3.13008)
Just what you need to deal with Twitter (and identi.ca)
Roberto Etcheverry - 2010-09-01T08:51:02 (permalink)
1 out of 3 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Net-Twitter
(3.04002)
It's fairly easy to use, subject to the limitations of the Twitter API. I was able to hack a script that interfaced with it quickly.
My only grumble is that it doesn't support proxies, but I can get by without that.
Robert Rothenberg - 2009-07-23T09:14:45 (permalink)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Net-Twitter
(2.12)
A rather shallow and infrequently updated access to Twitter. Lots of Twitter API calls missing; and no protocol to specify what these might be. Lots of errors with get_error and its ridiculous return values (sometimes returns hashref, arrayref, scalar, etc). Overall, it's much better to implement your own Twitter calls with LWP then relying on this outdated module. I made a big mistake using this in my script, and it has caused hours and hours of headaches to get rid of it.
lokilogan - 2009-05-18T23:55:22 (permalink)
5 out of 9 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Net-Twitter
(2.12)
great module! just what i needed! thank you!! :)
Supersan - 2009-05-06T04:32:16 (permalink)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Net-Twitter
(1.14)
Great stuff - does exactly what I needed, and with a clear, sane interface.
David Precious - 2008-06-19T08:38:35 (permalink)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Net-Twitter
(1.13)
It implements the Twitter API in a clear OO interface and is very well documented. My previous marks against this API for documentation issues are retracted.
hanenkamp - 2008-06-10T15:26:04 (permalink)
6 out of 6 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
