Moose-Tiny reviews

cpanratings
 

RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Moose-Tiny

Moose-Tiny (0.04) ***

Nice joke ...

Stefan G. - 2011-07-15T09:33:30 (permalink)

3 out of 4 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.04) ****

I see this module as useful, not really Acme, although it is funny, too.

The name could be better, (Moose::ObjectTiny::Migration?) but if you're migrating from Object::Tiny to Moose, this module is useful "in the middle" at least.

Curtis Jewell - 2009-09-05T08:15:26 (permalink)

3 out of 3 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.04) *

Might be fun but it also wastes the time of those not part of the humorous elite.

Dan Dascalescu - 2009-06-17T17:04:43 (permalink)

6 out of 13 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.0.3) *

A not-quite-funny joke that belongs in Acme::.

Pista Palo - 2009-01-27T06:36:00 (permalink)

5 out of 14 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.0.3) *****

This is one of the easiest ways to get the Moose seal of oo-guarantee right at the top of your code so it looks bright and shiny again.

Rodrigo de Oliveira - 2009-01-18T13:48:49 (permalink)

3 out of 4 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.04) ***

(Bumped to three stars, as this has become a useful module for benchmarking Moose performance for a specific common use case when compared to alternative techniques)

Supreme demonstration of ironic naming.

This is quite possibly the first case of the bloated version of a module being created AFTER the ::Tiny module.

This module is perfect for when you want to use 7 megabytes of memory to create an accessor.

Adam Kennedy - 2007-11-01T19:24:50 (permalink)

8 out of 18 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.0.1) *****

Hilarious social commentary on the absurd concept of second level namespace ownership. Nuff said.

Stevan Little - 2007-10-30T08:33:16 (permalink)

13 out of 18 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.0.1) *

Not ::Tiny at all and fails at being either practical or funny.

Aristotle Pagaltzis - 2007-10-13T12:45:04 (permalink)

9 out of 16 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Moose-Tiny (0.0.1) *****

I calculated that I spent more than 38 seconds a week typing the words "Object::Tiny". Now I've switched over to Moose::Tiny, and saved about 3 seconds a week! Over the course of my life, that will end up adding about 3 hours of not typing to my life. Yay.

The metaclasses are nice too.

Jonathan Rockway - 2007-10-13T09:33:40 (permalink)

8 out of 13 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No