| CPAN Ratings (Gamma) JSON-XS reviews | |
| Home | Search | About | Login |
RSS | Module Info | Add a review of JSON-XS
0 out of 2 found this review helpful:
It might be fast, but frequently it will segfault when encoding.
Bug Menot - 2009-07-09 17:32:58
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
We've used JSON::Syck before and experienced troubles with it after a while as it generates "JSON" which is sometimes not even valid JavaScript.
We've since switched to this module - if you ever need JSON encoding/decoding - use this!
Markus Peter - 2009-06-23 01:41:58
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
thank you for excellent module!
Egor Korablev - 2009-06-15 02:48:52
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
This module is just terrific. I've benchmarked it against other data serializers and, at least in simple cases, it's faster than them all, including Storable. Making JSON a more attractive format for configuration files. If I'd known about it sooner I could have saved many headaches trying to debug roundtripping data and reference problems.
Ashley Pond V - 2008-04-16 15:44:57
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Would it have been so hard to leave some backwards-compatibility stub/wrapper functions when you changed the API for 2.x? Or to have left 1.x on CPAN instead of deleting it, for those who are still holding back on your older version until they get all of their code fixed to work around the API breakage?
Brandon L Black - 2008-02-16 13:29:38
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
As far as I am concerned, this is the only JSON module you will ever need. It is fast (which I don't really care that much about, but it's a nice bonus), it is complete (the *only* JSON module which handles unicode correctly) and it is simple to use. We use it at work to produce medium-large (anywhere from 20-120K when saved to disk) JSON structures in 5 different languages (including Japanese), and it Just Works.
Excellent module, highly recommended.
Stevan Little - 2007-11-29 08:02:22
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
|
|
|