HTTP-Recorder reviews

cpanratings
 

RSS | Module Info | Add a review of HTTP-Recorder

HTTP-Recorder (0.05)

No comment about this specific distribution, but about specific reviews:

* Usage advice, tips and tricks, etc. belong in cpanforum.com or annocpan.org

* Bug reports belong in rt.cpan.org

If there are quirks that make it hard to use, or bugs, then they are certainly worth mentioning in the review. But the gorey details belong in appropriate forums, not reviews.

--Rob (at the risk of having this review marked useless)

Robert Rothenberg - 2007-11-18T11:40:48 (permalink)

3 out of 4 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

HTTP-Recorder (0.03_01) *****

This module has so much promise - there is nothing else like it for perl at the moment. It's still a little rough for now, but is already such a time saver (looking forward to the improving https support).

BTW, the article is at www.perl.com/pub/a/2004/06/04/recorde...

gbrock - 2004-12-16T17:56:59 (permalink)

1 out of 1 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

HTTP-Recorder (0.02) **

Read the article on www.perl.com about it and tried to configure.
Installed well on both Linux and Windows machines, but not make it work on either one. This module definitely need a more clear documentation.

Topchyan - 2004-06-18T09:11:58 (permalink)

1 out of 1 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

HTTP-Recorder (0.02) ****

This is SO cleaver - it will definatly make me write more of this sort of test - and more tests are always good!

We are also using it to write tests for our monitoring system.

As the docs say it doesn't do JavaScript yet - which is why I rated it 4 not 5.

Leo Lapworth - 2004-06-09T07:53:02 (permalink)

2 out of 2 found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No
1 hidden unhelpful review