RSS | Module Info | Add a review of File-LibMagic

3 out of 3 found this review helpful:

File-LibMagic (0.96) ****

After comparing against File::MMagic, File::MMagic::XS, File::Type, I ended up choosing File::LibMagic because it has the least problems and looks like being the most maintained (although it would be nice if the author cleans up the RT queue).

For those stuck without a C compiler, File::Type or File::Magic can be an alternative.

Steven Haryanto - 2011-06-15T03:57:24

Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No
1 hidden unhelpful review


the camel