RSS | Module Info | Add a review of EasyDate

EasyDate (103)

Previous reviews also fail to mention that the code does not actually work. The "new" method forgets that the class will be in $_[0] and thus has an off-by-one error that will make all new objects broken. In fact, the code doesn't even compile! (Bug report filed.)

Ricardo SIGNES - 2009-11-28 06:09:24
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

EasyDate (103)

Good.

mth1001 - 2009-11-28 01:11:47
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

EasyDate (103)

The module is not packaged properly, it lacks a Makefile.PL and/or a Build.pl, there are no tests and the documentation is lacking. It should not be introduced into the top level namespace and offers little that a good HOWTO for the existing Date or Time modules would do.

Jonathan Stowe - 2005-07-28 14:14:38
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

EasyDate (102)

This module does very little, is not packaged properly, and unnecessarily uses a top-level namespace. For serious date handling, I'd recommend DateTime.

Ivan Tubert - 2005-07-24 21:07:11
Was this review helpful to you?  Yes No

Perl.org sites : bugs | dev | history | jobs | learn | lists | use © Copyright 2002-2010 The Perl Foundation Site Information and Contacts root: (Vh | Vc)