RSS | Module Info | Add a review of Acme-Tiny
Acme-Tiny
(0.4)
That module is not tiny at all. It wastes one full byte (that's 8 bits!) by not using an integral version number.
Claus Färber - 2008-09-21T01:10:35 (permalink)
3 out of 6 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Acme-Tiny
(0.4)
This module is clearly not Tiny, it used lots of memory *AND* cpu during the installation process by loading both strict and warnings and running code in ExtUtils::MakeMaker. It followed by running 4 completely unnecessary tests (and loading the insanely resource heavy Test::More module, you could almost fry an egg on my motherboard!). Thank god I didn't have Test::POD or Test::Pod::Coverage installed or it might have started a fire!
If this module were *truely* ::Tiny, it would not have bothered to install itself at all!
Also note that the author used a lib/ directory adding an additional 63 bytes to the .tar.gz file. People, come on, disk space is not free!!!
5 star rating, but only for the reviews, not the module itself.
Stevan Little - 2008-04-05T14:33:28 (permalink)
8 out of 11 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Acme-Tiny
(0.4)
This modules leads the way in joke ::Tiny modules.
It makes all the others look like amateur whinging fools by comparison.
I approve.
Adam Kennedy - 2008-04-05T05:00:26 (permalink)
6 out of 10 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Acme-Tiny
(0.4)
Finally, we have a ::Tiny Acme module. :-)
Anders Nor Berle - 2008-04-04T17:47:17 (permalink)
4 out of 7 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Acme-Tiny
(0.4)
5 stars for p***ing people off. It's an Acme module, afterall. And an excellent example of one, too. If you don't like these modules, just don't include the namespace in your personal mirrors.
Robert Rothenberg - 2008-04-04T13:35:32 (permalink)
5 out of 7 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
Acme-Tiny
(0.1)
An excellent example of Tinyness
David Cantrell - 2008-04-03T10:33:32 (permalink)
5 out of 7 found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No
3 hidden unhelpful reviews
